Please share if you know a better approach. Going to start trying this approach to merging: Manually merging two archives? Make subsequent archives as in 1., but every time to a separate archive database We’ll also look at how consistent naming conventions can help you quickly locate related projects and how emojis can be used to add some visual flair. split the active database with the above process, but keeping the un-archived project in the active database In this article, we’ll look at some best practices for naming projects and single action lists, drawing some wisdom from David Allen’s Getting Things Done (GTD) approach.merge entire archive back into whole database. ![]() remove all completed projects from my active database.remove all active projects from that copy–this will give me an archive.My current plan is to be able find way to merge two databases which preserves dates. Has anyone tried to solve a similar puzzle? What is your approach? And from time to time I will likely need to i archive a project or two to continue working on it.Įmailed the support, but preserving dates when archiving is not in their foreseeable roadmap. And, of course, archiving only by projects can make sense, not by individual actions. ![]() To maintain historical record and to easier refer to earlier projects, I desperately need to preserve creation and, ideally, modified dates. I’m struggling to find my own strategy for archiving. ![]() This presents a problem when later trying to re-archive the project again after marking it “completed” a second time, since now there will be two projects in the archive with same name (and potentially different sets of tasks which have to be manually remerged together to maintain some sense of organization).Īll this has left me wondering… What would other users typically do in this use case? Am I archiving too frequently? Should I create a new project instead of trying to restore the archived project? What is the best way to keep the archive clean of redundant projects and tasks? When this happens, it’s typically because I had previously marked the project as completed (thinking that all tasks were closed and the project finished), archived the database on my mac (to trim down the database size), and then out of nowhere a related task comes along several months later that I could not have predicted.Īfter experimenting with the “restore from archive” functionality in OmniFocus, I discovered that restoring from archive doesn’t just restore the data from archive, but it creates a copy of the data (the original data residing in the archive and a new copy now residing in the main database). As much as I try to avoid it, I frequently find myself needing to restore an archived project back into the main database.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |